Effect of Pulse Duration and Repetition Rate

Introduction

Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate responds to laser pulse duration and repetition rate because these parameters strongly influence how deposited photon energy is converted—toward localized thermal rise (which can promote Cu(II) reduction, polymer carbonization and electroless-seeding) or toward non-thermal photomechanical/photochemical effects that principally ablate or fracture the host, depending also on local absorption and atmosphere. Short pulses with high peak power (e.g., femtosecond to picosecond regimes) favor non-thermal, electron-driven ionization and rapid ablation with limited heat diffusion, therefore reducing the degree of in-situ thermal reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(0). Longer pulses and/or high repetition-rate trains increase heat accumulation because energy delivered per unit time exceeds thermal dissipation, therefore enabling photothermal reduction pathways, polymer carbonization and char-related mechanisms required for LDS and smoke-suppression activation. The boundary for these mechanism classes is formulation- and geometry-dependent: particle size, loading, thermal contact with the matrix, laser wavelength (near-IR wavelengths may couple efficiently for some formulations) and substrate thermal diffusivity all shift the threshold between photothermal and non-thermal regimes. As a result, identical laser settings can produce conductive copper nuclei in one formulation but only surface damage or ablation in another when dispersion, loading or substrate thermal properties differ. Unknowns remain around exact fluence and repetition thresholds for specific host polymers and concentrations; these thresholds must be determined empirically for each formulation and geometry using controlled dose matrices.

Read an overview of the material: https://www.greatkela.com/en/product/p29/246.html

Common Failure Modes

• Failure: No electroless plating after laser exposure. Mechanism mismatch: delivered energy is likely dominated by non-thermal effects (ultrashort pulses or low average power) producing surface photolysis/ablation with insufficient net local heating to reduce Cu(II) to Cu(0); boundary: occurs when heat accumulation per pulse is below the reduction activation energy for the local microenvironment.
• Failure: Patchy or non-uniform copper nucleation. Mechanism mismatch: poor dispersion or low local loading leads to heterogeneous optical absorption and localized hotspots; boundary: exacerbated when repetition rate is too low relative to the host thermal relaxation time to cause cumulative heating, and when large particle agglomerates or micron-scale inhomogeneities concentrate absorption and reduce interaction uniformity.
• Failure: Substrate degradation (charring, cracking) without useful seeding. Mechanism mismatch: excessive average power or high repetition-rate causes prolonged heating and polymer thermal decomposition before controlled reduction chemistry proceeds; boundary: occurs when polymer decomposition temperature is lower than the temperature required for orderly Cu(II) reduction under given atmosphere.
• Failure: Clean ablation with minimal chemical change. Mechanism mismatch: femtosecond pulses tend to induce photomechanical removal that can dominate over photothermal chemistry, therefore removing additive-rich material instead of converting it; boundary: likely on thin coatings or near-surface additive accumulations where material removal outpaces in-situ chemistry.
• Failure: Incomplete smoke-suppression activation in PVC fires following laser pre-treatment. Mechanism mismatch: laser regime produced only superficial changes (e.g., color change) rather than the redox state modification or dispersion changes needed for subsequent thermal smoke-suppression; boundary: occurs when laser-induced reduction is limited to <surface diffusion depth and bulk additive remains chemically unchanged.

Conditions That Change the Outcome

• Variable: Pulse duration. Why it matters: pulse duration sets peak power and the dominant energy-conversion pathway because ultrashort pulses (fs–ps) favor electronic excitation and material removal, whereas longer pulses (ns–µs) deposit energy on timescales that allow electron–phonon coupling and heat diffusion, therefore promoting thermal reduction of Cu(II).
• Variable: Repetition rate. Why it matters: repetition rate controls heat accumulation between pulses; high repetition rates reduce cooling time, increasing steady-state temperature and enabling cumulative photothermal chemistry (Cu reduction, polymer carbonization), whereas low rates allow full thermal relaxation and favor isolated, non-cumulative events.
• Variable: Laser wavelength and absorption. Why it matters: absorption bands and charge-transfer features are formulation-dependent; some synthesized copper-hydroxyphosphate additives show electronic/charge-transfer absorption extending into the visible–near-IR, so choosing a wavelength that matches measured absorption for the specific formulation reduces required fluence, while off-resonant wavelengths require higher fluence to reach the same effect. [S₉,S₇]
• Variable: Particle size, loading and dispersion. Why it matters: smaller particles and higher loading increase effective absorption cross-section per unit volume and reduce the fluence needed for local heating; poor dispersion causes local over- or under-heating, changing whether reduction or ablation occurs.
• Variable: Host polymer thermal properties and thickness. Why it matters: polymers with low thermal diffusivity or low decomposition temperature will retain heat and favor reduction/char formation at lower repetition rates, whereas high-diffusivity substrates bleed heat away and can prevent photothermal activation under identical laser settings.

How This Differs From Other Approaches

• Thermal reduction pathway: energy is absorbed and converted to heat, causing Cu(II) → Cu(I)/Cu(0) via thermally driven redox and enabling polymer carbonization; this requires sufficient average power or repetition-rate-driven accumulation.
• Photothermal ablation pathway: absorbed energy raises local temperature rapidly and causes phase change and material removal; ablation can coexist with reduction if heating is controlled, but dominant ablation removes material and limits in-situ chemical conversion.
• Non-thermal photochemical/photomechanical pathway: ultrashort pulses induce electronic excitation, bond breaking and mechanical ejection with minimal lattice heating; this pathway tends to produce clean marks and micro-structuring rather than chemical reduction of copper species.
• Cumulative sub-threshold heating pathway: repeated low-fluence pulses produce incremental temperature rise leading to gradual redox chemistry because inter-pulse intervals are shorter than thermal relaxation times; mechanism depends primarily on repetition rate and host thermal time constants.

Scope and Limitations

• Applies to: laser interactions with formulations and parts containing Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate where the laser wavelength overlaps the additive's measured absorption band (wavelengths must be confirmed for the specific additive batch/synthesis) and where additive loading/dispersion are sufficient to contribute significant local absorption. [S₈,S₉]
• Does not apply to: materials lacking Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate, systems where the additive is fully encapsulated behind thick non-absorbing layers, or laser wavelengths far from the additive's measured absorption band such that coupling to the additive is negligible.
• When results may not transfer: lab-scale thresholds and observed mechanism transitions may not transfer across changes in particle size distribution, filler concentration, substrate thermal diffusivity, ambient atmosphere (oxidizing vs inert), or part geometry because these variables alter absorption, heat flow and redox kinetics.
• Physical/chemical pathway (causal): Cu(II)-containing hydroxyphosphate phases exhibit ligand-field and charge-transfer absorptions producing formulation-dependent visible-to-NIR absorption in many synthesized additives, therefore incident photons can deposit energy into the particle electronic system; energy conversion — electron–phonon coupling converts that electronic energy into lattice heat on material-specific timescales, therefore local temperature rises according to pulse duration and repetition rate; material response — if local temperature and dwell time exceed the (formulation- and atmosphere-dependent) activation energy, Cu(II) can be reduced to lower oxidation states and metallic nuclei may form, otherwise non-thermal processes or decomposition dominate. [S₈,S₉]
• Explicit unknowns/limits: exact fluence, pulse-duration and repetition-rate thresholds for switching between dominant mechanisms (non-thermal ablation vs photothermal reduction) are formulation-specific and are not provided here; these thresholds must be determined empirically for each polymer matrix, particle size, and additive loading.

Key Takeaways

• BCHP responds to laser pulse duration and repetition rate.
• Short pulses with high peak power (e.g., femtosecond to picosecond regimes) favor non-thermal, electron-driven ionization and rapid ablation with.
• Longer pulses and/or high repetition-rate trains increase heat accumulation.

Engineer Questions

Q: What pulse-duration regime favors thermal reduction of Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate to metallic copper?

A: Longer pulses (nanosecond to microsecond regimes) or pulse trains where inter-pulse intervals enable heat accumulation favor photothermal conversion and thermal reduction, because energy is deposited on timescales that allow electron–phonon coupling and local lattice heating; exact bounds depend on formulation and must be measured for each system.

Q: Will increasing repetition rate always increase copper reduction?

A: Not always; increasing repetition rate raises cumulative heating and can promote reduction when thermal relaxation is slow relative to pulse spacing, but excessive average power can instead cause uncontrolled substrate degradation or melting before orderly reduction; monitor surface temperature and chemistry rather than assuming monotonic behavior.

Q: How does particle dispersion affect laser activation outcomes?

A: Better dispersion and smaller particle size increase uniform absorption and lower the local fluence required for photothermal chemistry, therefore producing more uniform copper nucleation; conversely, agglomerates concentrate absorption and can cause localized ablation or substrate damage.

Q: Can ultrashort (fs/ps) lasers be used to activate Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate for LDS?

A: Ultrashort pulses typically induce non-thermal photomechanical effects that ablate material and produce micro-structuring; they can activate LDS only if parameters are tuned to create hotspots that subsequently thermally relax and enable reduction, but this often requires higher average power or additional post-treatment because direct fs-induced chemistry favors removal over reduction.

Q: What measurements are needed to determine the correct laser regime for a new formulation?

A: Measure the formulation's absorption spectrum in the intended wavelength region, host thermal diffusivity and thickness, particle size distribution and loading (including agglomeration), and run a controlled laser-dose matrix (vary pulse duration, fluence, repetition rate). For each matrix point assess oxidation state (XPS or Raman), surface morphology (SEM) and surface temperature or emissivity proxies to identify mechanism transitions.