Visible Color in Covert IR Marks

Introduction

Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate can produce a visible green tint when used as an IR-absorbing additive in covert NIR/IR marks because its copper(II)-containing crystal structure both absorbs near-infrared photons and includes Cu(II) chromophores that absorb in the visible green region. Mechanistically, NIR absorption occurs via electronic transitions associated with Cu(II) centers and the compound converts absorbed energy to local heating and chemical change, which can create or accentuate contrast under laser activation. The visible color appears either as an inherent green base-color at application concentrations or as a greenish residue when the additive is reduced/partially converted during thermal or laser processing. Boundary: this description applies where Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate is used as a dispersed powder phase in polymer or ink matrices and where laser activation or thermal exposure is at or below decomposition conditions that preserve the phosphate framework. As a result, in formulations lacking sufficient dispersion, or in systems where copper is substantially reduced to metallic copper, the visible outcome and its spatial localization change. Unknowns/limits: exact shade and contrast depend on particle size, loading, matrix optical properties and laser regime; these specifics require empirical mapping for each formulation.

Read an overview of the material: https://www.greatkela.com/en/product/p29/246.html

Common Failure Modes

• Failure: visible green tint appearing in nominally covert IR marks. Mechanism mismatch: additive's intrinsic visible absorption (green Cu(II) chromophore) is not masked by the formulation because loading or particle size is above the threshold where visible scattering/absorption becomes noticeable.
• Failure: low marking contrast in IR imaging despite visible coloration. Mechanism mismatch: IR absorption and energy conversion pathways are insufficiently activated because particle dispersion or interaction with the matrix (e.g., absence of halogen-induced chemistry in PVC) prevents effective NIR-to-thermal conversion.
• Failure: localized over-darkening or irregular color after laser marking. Mechanism mismatch: heterogeneous particle agglomeration produces non-uniform absorption and localized reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I)/Cu(0), causing patchy visible residues instead of uniform marks.
• Failure: visible staining or leaching of green color during use. Mechanism mismatch: incomplete chemical binding or encapsulation in the matrix allows copper phosphate dissolution or migration under acidic or outdoor runoff conditions, exposing the intrinsic green phase.

Conditions That Change the Outcome

• Variable: particle size and morphology. Why it matters: smaller, well-dispersed particles reduce visible scattering and provide larger specific surface area for NIR absorption and controlled thermal conversion; coarse particles increase visible tint and produce heterogeneous marking because optical scattering and local energy density scale with particle geometry.
• Variable: additive loading (wt%). Why it matters: because visible absorption and scattering scale with concentration, higher loading increases green coloration risk while lower loading may reduce IR absorption below activation threshold, so the optical balance is set by loading.
• Variable: polymer matrix chemistry (e.g., PVC vs polyolefin). Why it matters: PVC releases HCl on thermal degradation, and metal additives (including copper compounds) can alter dehydrochlorination and subsequent thermal chemistry; in non-halogen matrices that specific HCl‑mediated pathway is absent, therefore copper-driven thermal products and resultant visible residues may differ.
• Variable: laser regime (wavelength, pulse duration, fluence). Why it matters: because NIR photon absorption, heat diffusion and reduction chemistry depend on wavelength and pulse characteristics; short pulses concentrate energy and favor ablation/reduction while longer pulses favor thermal diffusion and broader color change.
• Variable: processing history and surface finish. Why it matters: prior thermal cycles, melt processing, or surface coatings change dispersion and surface exposure of particles, therefore altering both visible baseline color and the material's response to later laser activation.

How This Differs From Other Approaches

• Copper-hydroxyphosphate mechanism: visible green arises from Cu(II) electronic transitions and NIR absorption converts to local heating and possible Cu reduction; mechanism class = transition-metal centered electronic absorption plus redox-driven char chemistry.
• Metal-oxide IR absorbers (e.g., CuO, Cu2O) mechanism: rely on band-edge and defect-state absorption and often convert to dark oxide/metal states under heat; mechanism class = solid-state band/defect absorption with thermally-driven phase changes.
• Antimony-doped tin oxide (ATO) mechanism: primarily free-carrier absorption in the NIR with minimal visible color because the mechanism is plasmonic/free-carrier based rather than a visible-range ligand-field transition; mechanism class = conductive oxide free-carrier absorption.
• Molybdate or heavy-metal molybdate mechanism: act via catalytic redox and acid–base chemistry to suppress smoke and may generate different visible residues through decomposition products; mechanism class = oxyanion-mediated catalytic pathways rather than transition-metal d-electron color centers.

Scope and Limitations

• Applies to: dispersed Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate (Cu2(OH)PO4) used as a powder-phase additive in polymer compounds, inks, or coatings where NIR laser activation or thermal exposure is used to create covert IR marks. This explanation covers visible color origins, IR absorption mechanism, and redox/thermal pathways under typical laser/thermal regimes.
• Does not apply to: bulk crystalline mineral specimens, decorative pigments intentionally formulated for visible color, or systems where copper is intentionally complexed/chelated to remove visible absorption (those chemistries alter the electronic transitions).
• When results may not transfer: results may not transfer when particle surface is fully encapsulated in an optically thick, absorptive pigment binder, when additives are chemically modified (e.g., coated with silica or organics), or when a different copper compound with distinct electronic structure is substituted, because absorption and redox behavior change.
• Physical/chemical pathway (separated): Absorption: NIR photons are absorbed at Cu(II)-related electronic transitions and lattice defect states, therefore local energy density increases at particle sites. Energy conversion: absorbed energy converts to heat and can drive local thermal decomposition or reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I)/Cu(0), therefore altering optical properties. Material response: because the matrix and local atmosphere determine whether char, oxide, or metallic copper forms, the visible appearance changes (green from intact Cu(II) phosphate, dark/metallic where reduction occurs).
• Causal summary: because the material has an intrinsic visible chromophore (Cu(II)) and because NIR absorption can induce redox and thermal changes, therefore visible color in covert IR marks is a combined consequence of baseline optical absorption plus processing-driven chemical transformations.

Key Takeaways

• BCHP can produce a visible green tint when used as an IR-absorbing additive in covert NIR/IR marks.
• Mechanistically, NIR absorption occurs via electronic transitions associated with Cu(II) centers and the compound converts absorbed energy to local.
• The visible color appears either as an inherent green base-color at application concentrations or as a greenish residue when the additive is.

Engineer Questions

Q: What loading range causes visible green tint in typical polymer matrices?

A: There is no single universal threshold; because visible tint scales with concentration and particle size, engineers should empirically map the formulation - start tests at low loadings (<<1 wt%) and increase while monitoring visible contrast and IR response to find the balance for a given matrix and particle size.

Q: How does laser wavelength affect whether the mark is visible or only IR-active?

A: Wavelength determines which electronic or defect transitions are excited; copper hydroxyphosphate has documented visible absorption near ~530–540 nm and a NIR absorption tail with notable activity reported around ~808–900 nm. Therefore, lasers close to those absorption features (e.g., ~808 nm) more efficiently deposit energy and can produce visible residues via thermal conversion; absorption and effect at 1064 nm are weaker and should not be assumed equally efficient for all samples. [S11/S32]

Q: Can coating the particles prevent the green tint?

A: Coating can reduce visible scattering and limit surface chemistry because an encapsulant (e.g., silica or organic layer) modifies optical coupling and blocks direct redox interactions with the matrix; however, because absorption originates in the Cu(II) center, thick or optically absorbing coatings are required and their effect must be validated experimentally.

Q: Will using smaller particles eliminate heterogeneous dark spots after laser marking?

A: Smaller, well-dispersed particles reduce local hot-spots and improve uniformity because surface-area-to-volume increases and energy distribution becomes more homogeneous; nevertheless, reduction chemistry and matrix interactions still govern final appearance, so particle size is necessary but not sufficient to eliminate spots.

Q: Is Basic Copper Hydroxyl Phosphate safe for outdoor coatings?

A: Caution is warranted: safety data summaries indicate copper hydroxide/phosphate species can be hazardous to aquatic life and can mobilize under leaching/acidic conditions; therefore, designers should consider encapsulation or substitution and perform targeted environmental testing for outdoor applications.